Medical Ethics :: essays research papers

Quaestiones Disputate3) Whether it is ethical to keep a mortal alive if their pure tone of aliveness is not good and volition not improve. In much(prenominal) a case, what is the responsibility of the medical profession?     The undermentioned argument will be made toward the negative, suggesting that it is intrinsic ally unethical to keep a person alive under certain circumstances The first issue to utter is the sub- percentages of the Quaestione in order to better set the argument in makement as a proof. The Quaestione can be divided up into the following components whether it is ethical to keep a person alive , if their quality of carriage is not good , and will not improve. , In such a case, what is the responsibility , of the medical profession.     The first component is, in a general superstar, unarguable. Standing alone, the statement of keeping soul alive bears a right to which each human is morally obligate to uphold. T hey key here is standing alone....Of course societys enter of conduct says that we must preserve life, but this can only be true to a sense until the next issue is incorporated - what if their life is not good?      What exactly is not good? If we take it from an peripatetic point of view, we can see that Aristotle claimed that happiness or good nourishment - being happy, healthy, prosperous, and flourishing - is the goal of human life and the basis of all ethical behavior. This eudaimonia that he begins to describe is an end, in a sense that that goal has been reached. If one can no longer reach this last-ditch goal or end or is rendered unable to physically or mentally move oneself in that direction (after all, somebody else cant live your life for you to move you to happiness) their life is considered not good. A life rendered not good combined with our ethical obligation to keep someone alive, probably still not enough to grant the individual the net end.      Now if you listen closely, this is where the turning point begins. Being a teleologist, Aristotle claims that every meet is good only in so far that they achieve some good end. If life is not good, and we reach stage tercet where it will not improve, where is the action of keeping the individual alive stretchability a good end. The life is not good, nor will it ever be good - so what is the good end that would result that would warrant this action to be a good action.