Monday, March 25, 2019
Analysis of The One Minute Manager by Kenneth Blanchard and Spencher Jo
Analysis of The One Minute coach-and-four by Kenneth Blanchard and Spencher JohnsonThe One Minute Manager by Kenneth Blanchard, Ph.D. and Spencer Johnson, M.D., visualisems standardized a practical straightforward plan on managing state and there for opposite areas of ones life, however I must admit I am a little skeptical. The three philosophies do make nose bug out especially once analogies are used to put them into more simple terms. Being in the die hard force for more than fourteen geezerhood I shake off witnessed many types of mangers. I have worked for hostile managers, silence caring managers and managers who fit somewhere in between. My skepticism with this surmise is just applying its use. On paper this method sounds great and makes a lot of nominate points, but again after seeing start hand the types of people in management positions I think the challenge comes from undoing rate of flow behavior. My observation of people in general, is that they un welcome change and find it uncomfortable. The first philosophy One Minute Goal Setting makes tasks assigned to the unmarried clear and precise. The manager first expresses goals that need to be accomplished. Once an engagement is made, each goal is written down in 250 words or less. It is strongly held that it should take no more than a minute to read. You should repay each goal throughout the day. Also take time to assure at your performance and see if your behavior matches your goals. I agree with this theory and think there should be more interaction at the root system of an assignment. With One Minute goal setting everything is out on the table. at that place is no dispute on what should have been done or didnt get done. The bowling analogy used has a lot of verity to it. If there were a sheet in front of the pins with a supervisor standing behind it, it would be hard to tell how well your doing because you heapt see the pins or goal. Only the supervi sor knows your score. I see this a lot in staff showdowns. There are ordinarily conflicts between my manager and staff because of misunderstandings on the task assigned. This is where the conflict resides. The employee feels they did scarce what was asked while the employer thinks the job was done incorrectly. This usually causes my boss to criticize the work and most if not all people take it personally. Then, once the meeting is over, my peers will get defensive and complain t... ...my relationships with family, friends and loved ones I have a habit of not dealing with disappointing feelings right off because I dont want to cause conflict. My feelings begin to mature and I become more sensitive to other things that normally wouldnt tick me off, but do, because I am still upset round the first problem. Before you know it, I blow up and everything comes out anyway. Usually the person I am upset with has to hear intimately what they did a month ago and everything in between. This puts that person on the excuse and nothing currently gets accomplished until a few days later when we all calm down to discuss the issue. So logically if I dealt with my feelings in the beginning, the blowouts could be avoided and I could calmly get my point crosswise with little conflict. Overall the One Minute Manager concept seems like a dynamic way to keep employees happy and content in their jobs. In my opinion, I think the theory appears too good to be true. I am skeptical because managers would need to struggle with changing their underway behavior. I think for me to be convinced that this would work in the real life of business, I would need to experience it first hand.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment