Death penalty Essay -- essays research papers

I believe that cracking penalty has its benefits and can celebrate cut ups when used andunderstood correctly.The dying penalty given to people judged to ask committed extremely heinouscrimes such as murder has been a practice since before the beginning of Christianity.Since the 1800s most operations maintain resulted from convictions for murder. The get togetherStates is the besides Western industrialized nation that still proceeds in dandy penalty. War crimes, spying and murder argon the only if three offenses that draw the possible penaltyof the death sentence. In recent years, capital punishment has become a verycontroversial issue in the United States and new(prenominal) countries.Opposition to the death penalty says that states that have capital punishment havea very high crime rate. What they do not take into consideration is that every(prenominal) the states are contrastive and have different populations, different numbers of major cities, and differentcrime r ates. There is presently no capital punishment in Alaska, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine,Massachusetts, Michigan, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, andWisconsin. --Almost all have lower populations and a low crime rate. In otherwords, thestates that have capital punishment have it be understanding of the high crime rates, not the otherway around. Studies have shown that capital punishment deters murders. In 1985, a areapublished by economist Stephen K. Layson at the University of North Carolina showedthat every execution of a murderer deters, on average, 18 murders. The study also showedthat altitude the number of death sentences by one percent could prevent one hundred five murders. Itdoes not seem fair to me that a murderer can have a go at it while innocent people are dying,especially when it can be prevented. Violent crimes are capable of being deterred by lethal consequences for theiractions if only on a sub-conscience level. If the death penalty were just as consis tent,lethal, and as unstoppable as the AIDS virus, criminals would have reason to back down. by-line on from that, is the fact that abolitionists may claim that most studies showthat the death penalty has no effect on the murder rate at all. That is only because thosestudies have focused on inconsistent executions. Capital punishment like all oth... ...penalty is not cruel or unusual, and is a constitutionally accepted remedyfor a criminal act. In Trop v. Dulles, Chief evaluator Eark Warren, no friend of the deathpenalty said, Whatever the arguments may be a do goodst capital punishment, bothon moral drive and on grounds and in terms of accomplishing thepurpose of punishment the death penalty has been diligent throughout our history, and in a day when it is still widely accepted, it cannot be saidto violate the concept of cruelty. So the constitution does allow capital punishment.As for the penal system accidentally executing an innocent person, that is aproblem with the court system not capital punishment. It is up to the control panel and judge in amurder case to decide whether or not a person is guilty or innocent, and if the murderershould be put to death.So capital punishment is very capable of deterring murder if we allow it to, butthe legal system is so slow and inefficient, criminals are able to stay several steps aheadof us and gain leeway through our lenience. Several reforms must be made in the justicesystem so the death penalty can cause positive effect.