“Hero of Our Time” by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and “One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich” by Mikhail Lermontov Essay

The two unuseds Hero of Our Time indite by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich written by Mikhail Lermontov impart be compared for this World Literature Assignment (Comparative Study). The principal(prenominal) characters of these two sweets pull up stakes be compared and distinguished. In Hero of Our Time the main character is Grigory Alexandrovich Pechorin and the main character in One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich is Ivan Denisovich (Shukhov).The original Hero of Our Time is composed of five short stories and is ab come forward the adventures of the main character Pechorin. There are star-third main narrators in this novel, who are, the break writer, Pechorin and Maxim Maximych. Lermontov has used three narrators so the endorsers stinkpot key out three different perspectives making the ratifier see different views of the characters in the book. The reader in addition learns that the five short stories are not in chronological orde r. This makes it most what confusing for the reader only if at the same succession loll arounds the reader really interested in the book. The story is about how Pechorin is attempt in the social club he is documentation in and also at the same time struggling with himself. We find out his true feelings and thoughts in his journal where the reader feels sympathy for him. Pechorin to other characters in the book is never honest and sometimes is not in control of his emotions and actions. The aim of the designer is to show the readers if Pechorin really is the hero of his time or not. This is real ironic since the lack of morality suggests that he is not a traditional hero.The novel One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich is a description of one of Shukhovs mean solar days in a comprehend camp where he has been sentenced for ten years. We learn how prison house life is harsh and tough. In the craunch camp it is all about surviving, chumminess ( amongst the Prisoners) and c orruption. The reader learns that the only kick time Prisoners cast is during their meals. The prison life has forced some mountain to change. An deterrent example of this is where one of the prisoners, Fetiukov, has become the type of man who would steal potatoes out of another mans soup. The style of the novel is understated and straightforward. Solzhenitsyn has written this book very descriptively. Everything has been described accurately so the reader freighter buoy imagine and visualize the sur rotaryings. An example of this is when Shukhov is describing the mess hallThe mess-hall seemed as usual, with clouds of vaporisation curling in through the door and men sitting berm to shoulder corresponding seeds in a sunflower1This novel is written in the 3rd psyche form but we see through Shukhovs eyes. We get to know him as a foremost person so we get a broad perspective of him and also others, how they look at Shukhov. We show respect to Shukhov since he is surviving the stone-cold harsh conditions.The cold stung. A murky fog wrapped itself round Shukhov and made him cough painfullyIn the labour camp the permit treats the prisoners like animals where Shukhov treats them as comrades. Shukhovs one day in the labour camp is representing the run lows of millions of people who were sent to excavate camps during Stalins regime.If we look at Pechorins distinctions we learn that he has the characteristics of a Byronic Hero. This rout out be verbalize by looking at his behaviour, he is sulky, creates the sense of mystery, is isolated from the society and also rebels against social niceties of the time. A Hero of Our Time involves women. Pechorin is scared to get in love or make any kind of loyalty with any women since a fortune teller once told his mother that he would die when he gets married. Pechorin thinks about this and tries to avoid it, thus he makes excuses for not making any commitments with women. The reader gets the feeling that he is irra tional, although its open that he has an ambivalent character. Pechorin is a person who contradicts himself. He sets out to do something and at the end does the total opposite of it. This shows that he hatful be misleading.I lied, but I wanted to bait him. I was innate(p) with a passion for contradiction. My whole life has been nothing but a series of dismal, unsuccessful attempts to go against heart or reasonPechorin can be described as a womanizer since he likes to spiel against womens emotions and use them so they can benefit him and fulfill his own(prenominal) desires. He gets this satisfaction when he uses women, making him feel like a hero. The reader also learns that he is a character who cant even be honest to himself. This is not perpetually the case, for example when he writes in his journal he always tries to be honest. Pechorin is very self-analytical because he analyzes motives so we can see things from his perspective.Ive always detest entertaining, but now every day my house is full of guests, dining, supping, gambling.Pechorin makes the reader also assumes that his mental break down will be from women. promptly if we look at the characteristics of Shukhov, we learn that Shukhov is a prisoner of war in a labor camp. Life is very hard, just one day of his life shows so much about the living standards he is living in. Shukhov is a disciplined person and has not lost his civilized behaviour, like for example he would always take his cap off composition eating even when its freezing. Similarly Pechorin also has vainglory but his pride is his self-respect and his arrogance, mostly superficial things. The low living standards accept made Shukhov enjoy little things for example building a wall, import a piece of hacksaw blade so he can make a knife out of it. The most important characteristic about him is that he is a very honest man in particular to his comrades. He gives them respect and realizes like him he should not be here. The unatta ckable bond between his friends makes him want to live on. Comradeship is essential because without comradeship in the labor camp, surviving would be really difficult. Shukhovs pride and dignity has been taken away from him and he only thinks of surviving this labor camp. In the labor camp his better days are when he gets extra food and has not ended up in the lock-up. He sometimes thinks positive and thinks about the future that there is still some hope. He hopes to meet his family which is waiting for him.If we compare the two characters we see that Shukhov has a much stronger bond with his comrades/friends than Pechorin has with his friends. Shukhov has to have friends in order to survive in the prison because if he doesnt he would be even more mentally broken down. The bond of friendship makes him live on in that dreadful prison. It can also be said that Shukhov is a person who we can respect and who also shows respect to others.There is also a similarity between the two charac ters which is that they were/are both soldiers. This means that they have both encountered war and seen the dreadful sides of it. Another important similarity between them is that they are both shaped by society and the time that they live in. Although Shukhov is in prison and Pechorin isnt the reader feels that Shukhov still has more freedom. This is because Shukhov is a person who wont cause to be perceived anyone and respect everyone. In harvest-festival he is also trusted and no one has ever hurt him before. The reader feels that Shukhov has inner peace and that he is a kind of freedom. On the other hand Pechorin does not have that inner peace which Shukhov has this is because he is a selfish person thinking only of his desires. Since Shukhov is in prison he has the freedom of his political ideas and these cannot be punished since he is already in prison. This again shows how Shukhov has the freedom to do this but Pechorin doesnt.It can be concluded that Shukhov has a stronger character than Pechorin. This is because Shukhov is in general a benignant person who respects everyone. He is a civilized man and always thinks how he could survive the rest of the years so he can go back to his family. Pechorin is quite opposite to Shukhov, he has a fatigued character. This is because he is not trustworthy even at times not to himself because he contradicts him self a lot. It can be felt that Shukhov is the greater hero of his time since he makes the reader interpret for him without creating sympathy. But Pechorin wants the readers to sympathise for him by explaining his feelings, emotions and actions all the time.BibliographyBooks1) Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (2000) One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, Penguin Classics England2) Mikhail Lermontov (2001) A Hero of Our Time, Penguin Classics England1 One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Penguin Classics form (2000), England, rapscallion 1182 One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, Al eksandr Solzhenitsyn, Penguin Classics fluctuation (2000), England, page 233 A Hero of Our Time, Mikhail Lermontov, Penguin Classics (2001), England, page 774 A Hero of Our Time, Mikhail Lermontov, Penguin Classics (2001), England, page 84