Lincoln’s Presidency and Its Hallmarks on Future Presidents

What are the most important hallmarks of capital of Nebraskas leadership that influenced later presidents such as Teddy Roosevelt as they considered the role of the US presidency in Ameri jackpot political life? As the only chairman to preside all over an American Civil War, Abraham capital of Nebraska entered the office of the presidency with mounting challenges forrad of him. The countrys overwhelming divide regarding the issue of thrall be to be the central issue in the 1861 elections.President capital of Nebraskas strong resolve to reunite the totality catalyzed a sharp huckster in his beliefs regarding the weight of office staff in the administrator offset, constituent capital of Nebraska strengthen the office of the Presidency alike(p) never before. This set a precedent for future Presidents, nonably Theodore Roosevelt, whose polity on mammoth melody and deal gently and carry a braggart(a) stick methodological analysis to inappropriate transaction, while t horoughly of his own design, most certainly finds its root in the em billeted President capital of Nebraska.capital of Nebraska entered the Presidency rooted in the beliefs that the executive director branchs ability came second to the legislative, as express in the Constitution. His immediate predecessorsDemocrats Franklin Pierce and James Buchananhad set the pattern for a weak executive, conceiving their roles as little more than clerks who either approved or disapproved legislation developed from intercourses agenda, (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 175).However, following the secession of septette southern states immediately after Lincolns election, his focus became reuniting the union he sought to reassure his fellow countrymen and to prevent more states from seceding, (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 175). To pass this, Lincoln was headfast in his terminations, often reaching beyond traditional executive post and, in effect, overriding the other branches of inditeities. These deci sions were extremely disputed Groiler cyclopaedia says, As a commander in head word Lincoln was in brief noted for vigorous measures, sometimes at odds with the Constitution.Three controversial decisions Lincoln do include the implementation of a military draft, suspension of habeas corpus in umpteen regions, and finally, a plan to end slavery in his 1862 annual message to Congress. All of these events were controversial and Lincoln was accuse of ignoring the Constitution in many instances, yet he nearified it to many by claiming that it was necessary in the name of popular demand and universal exigency, (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 177).In essence, Lincolns power was a funneling of powers, delivered to other branches of government in peacetime, into the presidential office in wartime. He was centralizing authority, (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 178). In text titled A Constitutional History of the United States, author Andrew McLaughlin analyzes constitutional problems of the ci vil war, saying that The justification for such a measuring must be the existence of actual disorder or a condition which seriously panicens civil authority. Herein lies the debate, should a President grant the moral right to break the Constitution in order to surrender it? One of the first policies to centralize the Executive Branchs power was the implementation of a military draft in the root of Lincolns presidency On May 3 Lincoln issued a proclamation summoning 42,034 volunteers to serve for three years he to a fault called for an increase of the regular army by the addition of 22,714 officers and men, and for the enlistment of 18,000 seamen, (McLaughlin, 1935, 615).This proves to be controversial because it was employing a war power without a declaration of war, (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 177). Lincolns claim was that he was constitutionally designated as commander-in-chief and that the military risk to the Union made such actions necessary, (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 177). The draft ca apply riots in New York, as people vehemently opposed its institution. Another instance of constitution that was utilise with this newfound executive power was that he suspended the right of habeas corpus in many regions.According to text published in the daybook titled History Today, habeas corpus makes the force at the disposal of the chief executive subject to regulation by the courts. With it, a judge can demand that a pris unmatchabler be brought before him to evaluate whether the prisoners keep is legal. Without it, an unlawfully incarcerated individual has no legal remedy. The suspension of this right is one of the most controversial aspects of the Lincoln Presidency If Lincoln did not constitutionally have the power to uspend habeas corpus, then by doing so he fundamentally altered the freedom of American citizens, (Kleinfeld, 1997, 24).In defending accusations mostly made by Democrats that he was stripping Americans of their civil rights and liberties, Li ncoln claimed that he didnt even believe a law was violated The Constitution, he argued, does not expressly prohibit the president from suspending the writ, and it is unreasonable that a danger should harmonise its course until Congress can be assembled, (Kleinfeld, 1997, 24). This defense was often used in Lincolns behalf.According to Brinkley and Dyer, the issue was time and the necessity of acting quickly They also explain how it was often claimed to simply be efficient for the centralized power in the executive branch The presidency carried with it a unity of office which allowed for swift action impossible for the legislature, (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 178). Congress agreed to this justification for Lincolns centralized power they retroactively endorsed his actions, declaring them legalized and made valid, as if Congress itself had enacted them. (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 178).The final instance of a decision made using Lincolns strengthened Presidential powers was a plan del ivered to Congress in his 1862 address to its members. In this annual address, Lincoln proposed that Congress provide bonds to pay slave states that abolished slavery before 1900. He also, in the same address, proposed that Congress give money to help the closure of those former slaves who chose to move. This incentive to hasten the end of slavery was thoroughly Lincolns design, and was an unusual display of executive decision to Congress, (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 181).These are just a few of the examples detailing the centralization of power to the executive branch that occurred during Lincolns face. He effectively transformed the institution of the Presidency, as many presidents after him have kept up the centralization of power as tradition. An example of a later president who also ran his administration in this fashion is Theodore Roosevelt. Like Lincoln, Roosevelt presided over the nation at a crossroads the divide between the nineteenth century and the wentieth, between the anile presidency and the modern chief executive, between the old state and the new, (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 268). followers in Lincolns precedent, Roosevelts decisions over the regulation of uncollectible business in this fledging industrial nation, as well as his speak softly and carry a big stick methodology to conflicting form _or_ system of government, thoroughly illustrate this strong funneling of power into the office of the Presidency. At the fountain of Roosevelts administration, the big business era was just beginning. The United States had turned away from the isolationism which preceded the Spanish-American War. Now a world power with quickly expanding unlike markets, the United States was considered a major industrial nation, (Business and Economy in the 1900s, 1997).With this industrialization came consequences and fears regarding the growth of big business and power of large corporations. The growth of big business and its corresponding fears became the cent ral issue to Roosevelts domestic policy. Roosevelt enforced multiple laws in hopes of regulating large corporations, most notably his antimonopoly measures.According to a text titled Business and Economy in the 1900s, it was not until the Roosevelt administration that cases were pursued a shed light onst business owners and labor unions. Most notably was the Northern Securities case, in which the Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that the company had violated the Sherman Antitrust Act, which had been on the books for decades. Brinkley and Dyer explain that, Although Roosevelt did not want to eliminate large corporations, he used just prosecutions to arouse the authority of the executive branch, (274).Just as Lincoln used policy to enhance his powers as president, so did Roosevelt over 40 antitrust legislations were filed to a lower place Roosevelts presidency. Still focusing on the domestic issue of big business regulation, Roosevelts creation of The Bureau of Corporations was another notable event. after Roosevelts introduction of the Bureau in 1903, it was created by Congress to suss out and publicize the behavior of giant corporations, (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 275). This Bureau is what helped investigate the companies and then catalyzed legislation, furthering antitrust laws made under Roosevelts administration.Also parallel to the central power during Lincolns presidency, the president helped validate and get more power to the Executive Branch when he positioned himself to look like the representative of a public frightened and irascible over a new threat from business, (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 275). This is parallel to the power Lincoln managed to obtain when positioning himself to look like a representative of a frightened public during the beginnings of the Civil War, angry over slavery issues. Both men used their positions and the time in taradiddle to be seen in the same light.In terms of irrelevant policy, Roosevelt strived to make th e United States power reach global heights. His speak softly and carry a big stick approach to foreign relations reflected that the way the country handled its foreign relations depended entirely on the President, not Congressional legislation. An example of this includes events that occurred following his December 1904 State of the Union address, in which Roosevelt reinforced his Big Stick Policy by saying that continuing wrongdoing by Latin American states would compel the United States to an set of an international police power, (Big Stick and Dollar Diplomacy, 1998).This policy, reminiscent of the Monroe Doctrine, is known as the Roosevelt Corollary. It was first put into effect just weeks later, when Roosevelt negotiated a treaty with the friar preacher Republic saying that the US would manage the Dominican Republics foreign debts. Mirroring events of the Lincoln administration, when the Senate refused to ratify the treaty, the president carried it out by executive order, a m ove that touched off much criticism at home, (Big Stick and Dollar Diplomacy, 1998).In this case, Roosevelt used his Big Stick policy to pass legislation rejected by the Congress, just because he was President and his office had the power to do so. It is much like Lincolns implementation of policy without Congressional approval during the Civil War. To conclude, President Lincoln helped to strength the power of the Executive Branch like never before, helping give the Presidency more control of both domestic and foreign relations.At a delicate crossroads in American historythe Civil WarLincoln used the unique time to gain power through instatement of the draft, suspension of habeas corpus, and his proposals of bills to Congress. Following this precedent, President Theodore Roosevelt, also at a crossroads in United States history at the beginning of industrialization and big business, used similar tactics to gain and view as centralized control in the Executive branch through his tru st-busting efforts and legislation on big business at home, as well as his Big Stick policies abroad.